It appears that I'm not the only one in blog world assessing my life at the moment, no surprises there really what with New Year an' all. On this subject one of my favourite Ozzie bloggers Pip has been busy sorting out the good stuff for us all, I love this girl.
Apparently I'm a Maximizer and I need to adopt a bit more Satisficer attitude into my thoughts and decision making. Note to self, don't over think it.
Here’s a quick stroll through some of the key findings on the art of decision-making:
1. Satisficers vs Maximizers.
Coined by the economist Herbert Simon in 1956, “satisficing” is an approach to decision-making that prioritises an adequate solution over an optimal solution. Gretchen Rubin sums up the difference between the two types of decision-makers well in a post over at the Happiness Project:
Satisficers are those who make a decision or take
action once their criteria are met. That doesn’t mean they’ll settle
for mediocrity; their criteria can be very high; but as soon as they
find the car, the hotel, or the pasta sauce that has the qualities they
want, they’re satisfied.
Maximizers want to make the optimal
decision. So even if they see a bicycle or a photographer that would
seem to meet their requirements, they can’t make a decision until after
they’ve examined every option, so they know they’re making the best
possible choice…
In a fascinating book, The Paradox of Choice, Barry Schwartz argues that
satisficers tend to be happier than maximizers. Maximizers must spend a
lot more time and energy to reach a decision, and they’re often anxious
about whether they are, in fact, making the best choice.
If you're in the same boat as me, pop over to Pip's blog and you can read some more helpful stuff.